Friend v. Wise
This text of 111 U.S. 797 (Friend v. Wise) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the court.
*798 These motions are denied. The value of the two sections of land which are in dispute is conceded to be more than $5,000. The complaint alleges a joint entry and ouster, and the answer does not set up separate claims to distinct parcels of the land by the several defendants. The judgment for the recovery of the possession is against all the defendants jointly. In this respect the case is entirely different from those of Tupper v. Wise and Lynch v. Bailey, 110 U. S. 398. We have jurisdiction therefore.
The questions arising on the merits are, some of them, of a character that ought not to be disposed of on a motion to affirm.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
111 U.S. 797, 4 S. Ct. 695, 28 L. Ed. 602, 1884 U.S. LEXIS 1843, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/friend-v-wise-scotus-1884.