Friend, Kenneth v. Staples

2019 TN WC 188
CourtTennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims
DecidedDecember 20, 2019
Docket2019-03-1017
StatusPublished

This text of 2019 TN WC 188 (Friend, Kenneth v. Staples) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Friend, Kenneth v. Staples, 2019 TN WC 188 (Tenn. Super. Ct. 2019).

Opinion

FILED Dec 20, 2019

07:23 AM(CT) TENNESSEE COURT OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION

CLAIMS

eda EL AGE epg

TENNESSEE BUREAU OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION IN THE COURT OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION CLAIMS

AT KNOXVILLE KENNETH FRIEND, ) Docket Number: 2019-03-1017 Employee, ) Vv. ) STAPLES, ) State File Number: 46052-2019 Employer, ) and ) AGRI GENERAL INSURANCE ) Judge: Brian K. Addington COMPANY, ) Insurance Carrier. )

EXPEDITED HEARING ORDER

Kenneth Friend alleged he suffered an injury while working for Staples. He seeks medical and temporary total disability benefits. After the expedited hearing on December 13, 2019, the Court holds that Mr. Friend is likely to prevail at a hearing on the merits that he suffered an injury arising primarily out of employment. The Court awards medical benefits but denies temporary disability benefits at this time.

Claim History

Mr. Friend worked as a sales manager for Staples. On June 19, 2019, his job required him to sit on his heels while he changed merchandise in the store’s planograms. At some point during the day, he noticed knee pain after getting up from the floor. Although he did not describe a specific incident, he reported the pain to a co-worker. He also joked about his age and pain from working with the store manager, Audrey Henderson, but she did not file an injury report that day.

The next day, as he continued to work on his knees, he noticed increased right- knee pain but finished his shift. When he awoke on June 21, his day off, he noticed his right knee was swollen. When he returned to work on the 22™ he reported to Ms. Henderson that his knee hurt severely. She told him that reporting a work injury would cause a $3,000.00 loss to the store, but she nevertheless instructed him to call its third- party administrator to start a claim. An adjuster instructed Mr. Friend to go to the emergency room, where he described right-knee pain after twisting at work. The providers diagnosed soft-tissue fullness and joint effusion. They referred him to orthopedist Dr. Todd Griffith.

Mr. Friend told Dr. Griffith that he performed a great deal of squatting and twisting on June 19 and 20 and developed right-knee pain. Dr. Griffith ordered an MRI, which indicated a medial meniscus tear. On July 5, Dr. Griffith recommended arthroscopic repair and took Mr. Griffith off work. Instead of approving the surgery, Staples denied his claim.

Because he could not work, Mr. Friend sought short-term disability benefits. Staples started paying these benefits through the company. The parties dispute how much he was paid. He also works with his family’s barbecue business! despite his knee pain.

Because of this pain, Mr. Friend uses crutches, although he does not need them all the time.” He is willing to undergo the surgery Dr. Griffith recommended.

Concerning Dr. Griffith, both parties sent him causation letters. Dr. Griffith responded to Staples’s letter first, stating that Mr. Friend suffered an acute medial meniscus tear and MCL sprain. Dr. Griffith described how the work caused the injury in this manner, “Squatting and twisting at work on 6/19 & 6/20. Within 24 hours, had effusion. Hyperflexed knee w/twist puts stress on posterior horn of medial meniscus and MCL-the injuries noted on MRI & exam.”

Dr. Griffith responded to Mr. Friend’s counsel’s letter answering “yes” to Mr. Friend’s work being more than fifty percent the cause of his right meniscal tear considering all causes; the injury was acute; and symptoms from an acute meniscal tear may worsen over time.

Mr. Friend argued that he is likely to prove he suffered an injury primarily caused by his work, even though he cannot point to the exact instance his injury occurred. Staples countered that Mr. Friend’s inability to describe a particular accident defeats his claim.

Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law

To receive benefits, Mr. Friend must present sufficient evidence that he is likely to prevail at a hearing on the merits. See Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-239(d)(1) (2019); McCord v. Advantage Human Resourcing, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 6, at *7-8, 9 (Mar. 27, 2015).

' Mr. Friend greets customers, takes and fills orders, and sets up and tears down equipment. He earns income from the business.

? The Court reviewed a lengthy surveillance video that confirmed these facts.

2 The threshold issue is whether Mr. Friend suffered an injury as defined in the Workers’ Compensation Law. Tennessee Code Annotated section 50-6-102(14)(A) provides that an injury is “accidental” only if the injury is caused by a “specific incident or set of incidents means arising primarily out of and in the course and scope of employment[.]” Staples argued Mr. Friend cannot prove an incident or set of incidents at work caused his injury. The Court disagrees.

Mr. Friend told his co-worker and supervisor that he injured his knee at work. He told his medical providers that his injury happened while squatting and twisting at work. Dr. Griffith agreed that his injury was consistent with these actions. Nevertheless, Staples argued that he must be more specific as to the time the injury occurred.

The Court is not sure how he could be more specific. He testified that getting up and down from the floor on June 19 caused pain. He testified that he did the same work the following day and experienced increased right-knee pain after twisting his leg to stand up. That night, he experienced swelling. Dr. Griffith said this activity primarily caused Mr. Friend’s medial meniscal tear, and Staples presented no evidence that Mr. Friend injured his leg elsewhere. The evidence establishes that the incident or set of incidents at work caused his injury. Thus, the Court holds Mr. Friend is likely to prove at a hearing on the merits that his right-knee condition arose primarily out of his employment with Staples.

In light of this conclusion, the Court turns first to Mr. Friend’s request for medical benefits. Dr. Griffith, the authorized physician, recommended surgery. Mr. Friend is willing to undergo it. The Court holds that Mr. Friend is likely to prove that Dr. Griffith’s recommendations are necessary and reasonable to treat his condition, as it is the only medical opinion concerning the issue.

Next, Mr. Friend requested past temporary disability benefits from the date of injury. To establish entitlement, he must show he (1) became disabled from working due to a compensable injury, (2) a causal connection between the injury and his inability to work, and (3) the duration of the period of disability. Jones v. Crencor Leasing and Sales, TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 48, at *7 (Dec. 11, 2015).

Staples paid Mr. Friend’s wages through July 5 as he continued to work. Dr. Griffith took Mr. Friend off work that day, but he applied for and continues to receive short-term disability benefits from Staples. The Court notes that Staples is entitled to set off any temporary disability benefits from any payment under an employer-funded disability plan. See Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-114(b). Mr. Friend also worked for his family’s barbecue business for several weeks after the injury, which would also serve to reduce or exclude any temporary disability benefits. Under these circumstances, the Court denies Mr. Friend’s request for temporary disability benefits at this time. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED AS FOLLOWS:

1.

Staples shall approve the knee surgery Dr. Griffith recommended and provide further medical benefits under Tennessee Code Annotated Section 50-6-204.

Mr. Friend’s request for temporary disability benefits is denied at this time.

.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 50-6-114
Tennessee § 50-6-114(b)
§ 50-6-239
Tennessee § 50-6-239(d)(1)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2019 TN WC 188, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/friend-kenneth-v-staples-tennworkcompcl-2019.