Friedmann v. Friedmann

449 S.W.3d 400, 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 1045, 2014 WL 4703063
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedSeptember 23, 2014
DocketNo. ED 100135
StatusPublished

This text of 449 S.W.3d 400 (Friedmann v. Friedmann) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Friedmann v. Friedmann, 449 S.W.3d 400, 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 1045, 2014 WL 4703063 (Mo. Ct. App. 2014).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Dawn Friedmann appeals from the trial court’s Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, Order and Judgment dissolving her marriage to Timothy Friedmann. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the judgment of the trial court was supported by substantial evidence, was not against the weight of the evidence, and did not erroneously declare or apply the law. Ulreich v. Kreutz, 876 S.W.2d 726, 728 (Mo.App. E.D.1994). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ulreich v. Kreutz
876 S.W.2d 726 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
449 S.W.3d 400, 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 1045, 2014 WL 4703063, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/friedmann-v-friedmann-moctapp-2014.