Friedmann v. Friedmann

Missouri Court of Appeals

Friedmann v. Friedmann

449 S.W.3d 400, 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 1045, 2014 WL 4703063

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided September 23, 2014·No. No. ED 100135·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Dawn Friedmann appeals from the trial court’s Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, Order and Judgment dissolving her marriage to Timothy Friedmann. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the judgment of the trial court was supported by substantial evidence, was not against the weight of the evidence, and did not erroneously declare or apply the law. Ulreich v. Kreutz, 876 S.W.2d 726, 728 (Mo.App. E.D.1994). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Dawn Friedmann appeals from the trial court’s Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, Order and Judgment dissolving her marriage to Timothy Friedmann. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the judgment of the trial court was supported by substantial evidence, was not against the weight of the evidence, and did not erroneously declare or apply the law. Ulreich v. Kreutz, 876 S.W.2d 726, 728 (Mo.App. E.D.1994). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

Friedmann v. Friedmann, 449 S.W.3d 400, 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 1045, 2014 WL 4703063 (Mo. Ct. App. 2014).

Pincite

449 S.W.3d 400 (Friedmann v. Friedmann) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related