Friedmann v. Friedmann
This text of 449 S.W.3d 400 (Friedmann v. Friedmann) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
Dawn Friedmann appeals from the trial court’s Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, Order and Judgment dissolving her marriage to Timothy Friedmann. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the judgment of the trial court was supported by substantial evidence, was not against the weight of the evidence, and did not erroneously declare or apply the law. Ulreich v. Kreutz, 876 S.W.2d 726, 728 (Mo.App. E.D.1994). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
449 S.W.3d 400, 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 1045, 2014 WL 4703063, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/friedmann-v-friedmann-moctapp-2014.