Friedman v. Waldbaum's, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Friedman v. Waldbaum's, Inc.

86 A.D.2d 888, 450 N.Y.S.2d 402, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15541

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 22, 1982

StatusPublished

This text of 86 A.D.2d 888 (Friedman v. Waldbaum's, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Friedman v. Waldbaum's, Inc., 86 A.D.2d 888, 450 N.Y.S.2d 402, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15541 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1982).

Pincite

Opinion

In a personal injury action, defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Daronco, J.), entered April 23, 1981, which, inter alia, denied its motion for a protective order. Order modified so as to limit production of the accident reports to a period of three years prior to the date of the plaintiff’s accident and to the area within 100 feet of the place of the accident. As so modified, order affirmed, with $50 costs and disbursements to plaintiff. Defendant’s time to produce the reports is extended until 20 days after service upon it of a copy of the order to be made hereon, with notice of entry. The notice for discovery and inspection requesting “[a]ll accident reports * * * since the time that defendant has operated a store at this location” was overly broad to the extent indicated. Mollen, P. J., Mangano, Gibbons and Thompson, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a personal injury action, defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Daronco, J.), entered April 23, 1981, which, inter alia, denied its motion for a protective order. Order modified so as to limit production of the accident reports to a period of three years prior to the date of the plaintiff’s accident and to the area within 100 feet of the place of the accident. As so modified, order affirmed, with $50 costs and disbursements to plaintiff. Defendant’s time to produce the reports is extended until 20 days after service upon it of a copy of the order to be made hereon, with notice of entry. The notice for discovery and inspection requesting “[a]ll accident reports * * * since the time that defendant has operated a store at this location” was overly broad to the extent indicated. Mollen, P. J., Mangano, Gibbons and Thompson, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

86 A.D.2d 888, 450 N.Y.S.2d 402, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15541, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/friedman-v-waldbaums-inc-nyappdiv-1982.