Friedman v. Van Antwerp

Hamilton Circuit Court

Friedman v. Van Antwerp

23 Ohio C.C. Dec. 518, 14 Ohio C.C. (n.s.) 333, 1911 Ohio Misc. LEXIS 212

DecidedAugust 1, 1911

StatusPublished

This text of 23 Ohio C.C. Dec. 518 (Friedman v. Van Antwerp) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hamilton Circuit Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Friedman v. Van Antwerp, 23 Ohio C.C. Dec. 518, 14 Ohio C.C. (n.s.) 333, 1911 Ohio Misc. LEXIS 212 (Ohio Super. Ct. 1911).

Pincite

Opinion

SMITH, P. J.

Under Gen. Code 2667, 2669, 2670 and 2671 relating to actions by treasurers of counties for recovery of unpaid taxes or assessments, the court- is of the opinion that the owner or owners of the real estate ordered sold to enforce the lien of such taxes or assessments may redeem the same at any time before the confirmation of the sale thereof.

The record in the above case discloses that before confirmation of the sale to plaintiffs in error of the real estate described in the petition, the court allowed the owners to redeem the same upon the payment of all liens for taxes, assessments, penalties, etc., due.

We find no error in the court overruling the motion of the purchasers to confirm the sale to them, and the judgment therefore will be affirmed.

Swing and Jones, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SMITH, P. J.

Under Gen. Code 2667, 2669, 2670 and 2671 relating to actions by treasurers of counties for recovery of unpaid taxes or assessments, the court- is of the opinion that the owner or owners of the real estate ordered sold to enforce the lien of such taxes or assessments may redeem the same at any time before the confirmation of the sale thereof.

The record in the above case discloses that before confirmation of the sale to plaintiffs in error of the real estate described in the petition, the court allowed the owners to redeem the same upon the payment of all liens for taxes, assessments, penalties, etc., due.

We find no error in the court overruling the motion of the purchasers to confirm the sale to them, and the judgment therefore will be affirmed.

Swing and Jones, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

23 Ohio C.C. Dec. 518, 14 Ohio C.C. (n.s.) 333, 1911 Ohio Misc. LEXIS 212, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/friedman-v-van-antwerp-ohcircthamilton-1911.