Friedman v. U.S. Secret Service
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
________________________________ ) DONALD FRIEDMAN, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 06-2125 (KBJ) ) UNITED STATES SECRET SERVICE, ) ) Defendant. ) ________________________________ )
MEMORANDUM OPINION
On October 22, 2013, the United States Secret Service filed Defendant’s Second
Renewed Motion for Summary Judgment [ECF No. 96]. The Court advised the plaintiff
of his obligations under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the local rules of this
Court to respond to the motion, and specifically warned him that, if he did not respond
to the motion by November 22, 2013, the Court may treat the motion as conceded. The
plaintiff’s motion for a continuance [ECF No. 100] was denied without prejudice on
December 4, 2013, for plaintiff’s failure to show good cause for an extension of time.
To date, the plaintiff neither has filed an opposition to the motion and nor has requested
more time to do so. Accordingly, the Court will dismiss this action. An Order is issued
separately.
DATE: January 2, 2014 /s/ KETANJI BROWN JACKSON United States District Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Friedman v. U.S. Secret Service (Friedman v. U.S. Secret Service) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.