Friedman v. University of Miami
881 So. 2d 612, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 9970, 2004 WL 1506261
Opinion
Like the trial court, we find no basis in the record for interfering with the decision of the Board of Trustees of the University of Miami which, as it was authorized by the pertinent University rules, revoked the tenure status of a professor of business administration at the University contrary to a majority recommendation of a faculty hearing committee. See Kumbhojkar v. University of Miami, 727 So.2d 275 (Fla. Bd DCA 1999), review denied, 735 So.2d 1285 (Fla.1999).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Friedman v. University of Miami, 881 So. 2d 612, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 9970, 2004 WL 1506261 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).
881 So. 2d 612 (Friedman v. University of Miami) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Kumbhojkar v. University of Miami
727 So. 2d 275 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)