Friedman v. United States of America
Opinion
1|| LisA A. RASMUSSEN, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 7491 2 || LAW OFFICE OF LISA RASMUSSEN, P.C, 601 South 10" Street, Suite #100 3 || Las Vegas, NV 89101 Tel. (702) 471-1436 411 Fax. (702) 489-6619 5 Email: Lisa@LRasmussenLaw.com 6 || MELANIE A. HILL, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 8796 7 || MELANIE HILL LAW PLLC 520 S. 7 Street, Suite A 8 || Las Vegas, NV 89101 Tel. — (702) 362-8500 Fax. (702) 362-8505 10 Email: Melanie@MelanieHillLaw.com 1 Attorneys for Plaintiff Scott Friedman 12 15 16 || SCOTT FRIEDMAN, an individual, Case No. 2:18-C V-000857-JCM-VCF 17 Plaintiff, 8 JOINT MOTION TO WITHDRAW 1 v. PLAINTIFF SCOTT FRIEDMAN’S 19 MOTION TO RE-TAX THE UNITED UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; et. al., STATES’ AWARD OF COSTS [ECF 20 No. 341] ONLY 21 Defendants. 22 23 Counsel for Plaintiff, Melanie A. Hill of Melanie Hill Law PLLC and counsel for the Unit 24 || States, Greg Addington, Assistant United Stated Attorney, hereby jointly move to withdraw Plainti 25 || Scott Friedman’s Motion to Re-Tax the United States’ Award of Costs [ECF No. 341] only. 26 On December 22, 2020, Defendant United States filed a Satisfaction of Judgment Regardi 27 Award of Costs to United States [ECF No. 359] acknowledging “receipt and acceptance of an □□□□□ 28 negotiated sum from plaintiff Scott Friedman, in full satisfaction of the award of costs to the Unite
1 States (see dkt. #337).” Based on the satisfaction of the award of costs to the United States, Plaint 2 Scott Friedman’s Motion to Re-Tax the United States’ Award of Costs [ECF No. 341] only is moc 3 4 Therefore, the parties request that it be withdrawn based on the satisfaction of the award of costs
5 the United States. This motion to withdraw does not request a withdrawal of Plaintiff Scott Friedman 6 Motion to Re-Tax the LVMPD Defendants’ Award of Costs [ECF No. 341] that was argued in tl 7 || same motion as the Motion to Re-Tax the United States’ Award of Costs [ECF No. 341]. Therefor 8 || the motion to re-tax should only be partially withdrawn as it relates to the arguments to re-tax tl Q || United States’ award of costs only. 10 DATED this 11" day of January, 2021. 11 United States Attorney MELANIE HILL LAW PLLC 13 14 By: /s/ Greg Addington By: /s/ Melanie A. Hill GREG ADDINGTON MELANIE A. HILL 15 Assistant United States Attorney Nevada Bar No. 8796 6 Nevada Bar No. 6875 Attorneys for Plaintiff Scott Friedman 1 Attorneys for Defendant United States 17 of America 18 19 20 IT IS SO ORDERED: 21 22 se Bitdiad © Atal ls 23 JAMES\C. MAHAN UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 24 DATED: vanuary 22, 2021 25 26 27 28
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Friedman v. United States of America (Friedman v. United States of America) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.