Friedman v. United States of America

District Court, D. Nevada·Decided January 22, 2021·No. 2:18-cv-00857·Unknown

Opinion

1|| LisA A. RASMUSSEN, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 7491 2 || LAW OFFICE OF LISA RASMUSSEN, P.C, 601 South 10" Street, Suite #100 3 || Las Vegas, NV 89101 Tel. (702) 471-1436 411 Fax. (702) 489-6619 5 Email: Lisa@LRasmussenLaw.com 6 || MELANIE A. HILL, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 8796 7 || MELANIE HILL LAW PLLC 520 S. 7 Street, Suite A 8 || Las Vegas, NV 89101 Tel. — (702) 362-8500 Fax. (702) 362-8505 10 Email: Melanie@MelanieHillLaw.com 1 Attorneys for Plaintiff Scott Friedman 12 15 16 || SCOTT FRIEDMAN, an individual, Case No. 2:18-C V-000857-JCM-VCF 17 Plaintiff, 8 JOINT MOTION TO WITHDRAW 1 v. PLAINTIFF SCOTT FRIEDMAN’S 19 MOTION TO RE-TAX THE UNITED UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; et. al., STATES’ AWARD OF COSTS [ECF 20 No. 341] ONLY 21 Defendants. 22 23 Counsel for Plaintiff, Melanie A. Hill of Melanie Hill Law PLLC and counsel for the Unit 24 || States, Greg Addington, Assistant United Stated Attorney, hereby jointly move to withdraw Plainti 25 || Scott Friedman’s Motion to Re-Tax the United States’ Award of Costs [ECF No. 341] only. 26 On December 22, 2020, Defendant United States filed a Satisfaction of Judgment Regardi 27 Award of Costs to United States [ECF No. 359] acknowledging “receipt and acceptance of an □□□□□ 28 negotiated sum from plaintiff Scott Friedman, in full satisfaction of the award of costs to the Unite

1 States (see dkt. #337).” Based on the satisfaction of the award of costs to the United States, Plaint 2 Scott Friedman’s Motion to Re-Tax the United States’ Award of Costs [ECF No. 341] only is moc 3 4 Therefore, the parties request that it be withdrawn based on the satisfaction of the award of costs

5 the United States. This motion to withdraw does not request a withdrawal of Plaintiff Scott Friedman 6 Motion to Re-Tax the LVMPD Defendants’ Award of Costs [ECF No. 341] that was argued in tl 7 || same motion as the Motion to Re-Tax the United States’ Award of Costs [ECF No. 341]. Therefor 8 || the motion to re-tax should only be partially withdrawn as it relates to the arguments to re-tax tl Q || United States’ award of costs only. 10 DATED this 11" day of January, 2021. 11 United States Attorney MELANIE HILL LAW PLLC 13 14 By: /s/ Greg Addington By: /s/ Melanie A. Hill GREG ADDINGTON MELANIE A. HILL 15 Assistant United States Attorney Nevada Bar No. 8796 6 Nevada Bar No. 6875 Attorneys for Plaintiff Scott Friedman 1 Attorneys for Defendant United States 17 of America 18 19 20 IT IS SO ORDERED: 21 22 se Bitdiad © Atal ls 23 JAMES\C. MAHAN UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 24 DATED: vanuary 22, 2021 25 26 27 28

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Friedman v. United States of America, (D. Nev. 2021).

Friedman v. United States of America (Friedman v. United States of America) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.