Friedman v. United States
This text of 62 Cust. Ct. 1060 (Friedman v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of bulrush, corn husk, or maize baskets similar in all material respects to those the subject of Carson M. Simon & Co. v. United States (55 Cust. Ct. 103, C.D. 2558) and Morris Friedman v. United States (58 Cust. Ct. 456, C.D. 3019), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
62 Cust. Ct. 1060, 1969 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 3416, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/friedman-v-united-states-cusc-1969.