Friedman v. United States

190 F.2d 364, 1951 U.S. App. LEXIS 2427
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·Decided June 1, 1951·No. 11325_1·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This case came on to be heard upon the record and briefs and oral argument of counsel.

And it appearing that the indictment, although loosely drawn and not to be commended, contains the elements of the offense intended to be charged and fairly apprises the appellant of the 'charges against him. Hagner v. United States, 285 U.S. 427, 431, 433, 52 S.Ct. 417, 76 L.Ed. 861.

And it appearing that jury trial was waived and the case was tried to the court, and that sufficient evidence was presented to support the finding of the court that the letter addressed by the appellant to- *365 the prosecuting witness constituted a violation of § 873, 18 U.S.C.

It is ordered that the judgment be, and it hereby is, affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Friedman v. United States, 190 F.2d 364, 1951 U.S. App. LEXIS 2427 (6th Cir. 1951).

190 F.2d 364 (Friedman v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Smith
228 F. Supp. 345 (E.D. Louisiana, 1964)