Friedman v. Thruway Super Duper, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Friedman v. Thruway Super Duper, Inc.

190 A.D.2d 1054, 593 N.Y.S.2d 717, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1273

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 5, 1993·Published

Opinion

— Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly denied plaintiffs’ motion to compel disclosure of accident reports relating to plaintiff Anna Friedman’s alleged slip and fall in defendant’s store. Although an accident report prepared in the regular course of defendant’s business operations is subject to disclosure (see, CPLR 3101 [g]), defendant advised the court that a report of the alleged accident did not exist. (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Wolfgang, J.— Discovery.) Present — Denman, P. J., Boomer, Green, Balio and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly denied plaintiffs’ motion to compel disclosure of accident reports relating to plaintiff Anna Friedman’s alleged slip and fall in defendant’s store. Although an accident report prepared in the regular course of defendant’s business operations is subject to disclosure (see, CPLR 3101 [g]), defendant advised the court that a report of the alleged accident did not exist. (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Wolfgang, J.— Discovery.) Present — Denman, P. J., Boomer, Green, Balio and Davis, JJ.

Friedman v. Thruway Super Duper, Inc., 190 A.D.2d 1054, 593 N.Y.S.2d 717, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1273 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

190 A.D.2d 1054 (Friedman v. Thruway Super Duper, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.