Friedman v. Thruway Super Duper, Inc.

190 A.D.2d 1054, 593 N.Y.S.2d 717, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1273

This text of 190 A.D.2d 1054 (Friedman v. Thruway Super Duper, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Friedman v. Thruway Super Duper, Inc., 190 A.D.2d 1054, 593 N.Y.S.2d 717, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1273 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

Opinion

— Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly denied plaintiffs’ motion to compel disclosure of accident reports relating to plaintiff Anna Friedman’s alleged slip and fall in defendant’s store. Although an accident report prepared in the regular course of defendant’s business operations is subject to disclosure (see, CPLR 3101 [g]), defendant advised the court that a report of the alleged accident did not exist. (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Wolfgang, J.— Discovery.) Present — Denman, P. J., Boomer, Green, Balio and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
190 A.D.2d 1054, 593 N.Y.S.2d 717, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1273, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/friedman-v-thruway-super-duper-inc-nyappdiv-1993.