Friedman v. Sullivan

138 So. 431, 173 La. 647, 1931 La. LEXIS 1922
CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana
DecidedNovember 30, 1931
DocketNo. 31492.
StatusPublished

This text of 138 So. 431 (Friedman v. Sullivan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Friedman v. Sullivan, 138 So. 431, 173 La. 647, 1931 La. LEXIS 1922 (La. 1931).

Opinion

On Motion to Dismiss.

ST. PAUL, J.

The administrator herein sequestered certain cattle of the value of $500, claiming that they belonged to the succession and had been unlawfully taken possession of by one Mrs. Belle Friedman and her husband.

The defendants in the sequestration proceedings moved to dissolve the'writ, but the trial judges ruled against them.

Thereupon the plaintiffs in rule sought and obtained an appeal to this court, which appeal the administrator moves to dismiss.

As the amount involved is only $500, and there is no question of a fund to be distributed, it is clear that this court has no jurisdiction, and the appeal will therefore be transferred to the proper Court of Appeal.

Decree.

For the reasons assigned, it is therefore ordered that this appeal be now transferred to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, for the parish of East Baton Rouge, provided that the record, or a duly certified transcript thereof, be filed in said Court of Appeal within twenty days after this decree becomes final; otherwise the appeal to stand dismissed.

It is further ordered that the appellant pay the costs of this court, and that all other costs await the final disposition of' the case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
138 So. 431, 173 La. 647, 1931 La. LEXIS 1922, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/friedman-v-sullivan-la-1931.