Friedman v. Political Action Committee for Palestine, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Friedman v. Political Action Committee for Palestine, Inc.

272 A.D.2d 1042

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 14, 1947

StatusPublished

This text of 272 A.D.2d 1042 (Friedman v. Political Action Committee for Palestine, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Friedman v. Political Action Committee for Palestine, Inc., 272 A.D.2d 1042 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1947).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Whether the provisions of sections 167 and 168 of the General Business Law requiring a license by those engaged in the business of reselling theatre tickets apply to the plaintiffs can best be determined upon a trial of the action, at which the plaintiffs’ activities generally and under the contract involved in this case may be fully developed.

The order appealed from should be reversed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the appellants, defendant’s cross motion for judgment on the pleadings denied and plaintiffs’ motion to examine defendant before trial granted as to item 5 only of plaintiff’s notice of motion.

Peck, P. J., Glennon, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ., concur.

Order unanimously reversed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the appellants, defendant’s cross motion for judgment on the pleadings denied and plaintiffs’ motion to examine defendant before trial granted as to item 5 only of plaintiffs’ notice of motion. Settle order on notice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Whether the provisions of sections 167 and 168 of the General Business Law requiring a license by those engaged in the business of reselling theatre tickets apply to the plaintiffs can best be determined upon a trial of the action, at which the plaintiffs’ activities generally and under the contract involved in this case may be fully developed.

The order appealed from should be reversed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the appellants, defendant’s cross motion for judgment on the pleadings denied and plaintiffs’ motion to examine defendant before trial granted as to item 5 only of plaintiff’s notice of motion.

Peck, P. J., Glennon, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ., concur.

Order unanimously reversed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the appellants, defendant’s cross motion for judgment on the pleadings denied and plaintiffs’ motion to examine defendant before trial granted as to item 5 only of plaintiffs’ notice of motion. Settle order on notice.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

272 A.D.2d 1042, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/friedman-v-political-action-committee-for-palestine-inc-nyappdiv-1947.