Friedman v. Odora Co.
273 A.D. 755, 75 N.Y.S.2d 515, 1947 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2988
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 12, 1947·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
We find that the three defenses attacked are insufficient in law. (See Pollitz V. Wabash Bailroad Go., No. 1,150 App. Div. 709; Pollitz v. Wabash Bailroad Co., No. 2, 150 App. Div. 715.) Order, so far as appealed from, unanimously modified by granting plaintiff’^ cross motion to dismiss said defenses and by denying examination of plaintiff before trial on item 8 in said order and as so modified affirmed, with $20 costs and dsibursements to the appellant. Settle order on notice. Present — Peck, P. J., Dore, Cohn, Callahan and Shientag, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Friedman v. Odora Co., 273 A.D. 755, 75 N.Y.S.2d 515, 1947 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2988 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1947).
273 A.D. 755 (Friedman v. Odora Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Mt. Zion Baptist Church of Port Chester, Inc. v. Brown
23 Misc. 2d 28 (New York Supreme Court, 1959)
Pfeiffer v. Berke
4 Misc. 2d 918 (New York Supreme Court, 1953)