Friedman v. Odora Co.
This text of 273 A.D. 755 (Friedman v. Odora Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We find that the three defenses attacked are insufficient in law. (See Pollitz V. Wabash Bailroad Go., No. 1,150 App. Div. 709; Pollitz v. Wabash Bailroad Co., No. 2, 150 App. Div. 715.) Order, so far as appealed from, unanimously modified by granting plaintiff’^ cross motion to dismiss said defenses and by denying examination of plaintiff before trial on item 8 in said order and as so modified affirmed, with $20 costs and dsibursements to the appellant. Settle order on notice. Present — Peck, P. J., Dore, Cohn, Callahan and Shientag, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
273 A.D. 755, 75 N.Y.S.2d 515, 1947 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2988, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/friedman-v-odora-co-nyappdiv-1947.