Friedman v. Metropolitan New York Council

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Friedman v. Metropolitan New York Council

43 A.D.2d 697, 350 N.Y.S.2d 609, 1973 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3014

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 3, 1973

StatusPublished

This text of 43 A.D.2d 697 (Friedman v. Metropolitan New York Council) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Friedman v. Metropolitan New York Council, 43 A.D.2d 697, 350 N.Y.S.2d 609, 1973 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3014 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1973).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the third-party defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated July 30, 1973, which denied (1) its motion to sever the third-party action from plaintiffs’ action and (2) its motion for reargument. Order affirmed insofar as it denied the original motion. No opinion. Appeal dismissed insofar as it is from the portion of the order which denied the motion for reargument. No appeal lies from a denial of a motion for reargument. One bill of $20 costs and disbursements is awarded jointly to respondents appearing separately and filing separate briefs. Rabin, P. J., Hopkins, Munder, Martuscello and Latham, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the third-party defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated July 30, 1973, which denied (1) its motion to sever the third-party action from plaintiffs’ action and (2) its motion for reargument. Order affirmed insofar as it denied the original motion. No opinion. Appeal dismissed insofar as it is from the portion of the order which denied the motion for reargument. No appeal lies from a denial of a motion for reargument. One bill of $20 costs and disbursements is awarded jointly to respondents appearing separately and filing separate briefs. Rabin, P. J., Hopkins, Munder, Martuscello and Latham, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

43 A.D.2d 697, 350 N.Y.S.2d 609, 1973 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3014, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/friedman-v-metropolitan-new-york-council-nyappdiv-1973.