Friedman v. Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department
This text of 465 F. App'x 600 (Friedman v. Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM **
Kenneth A. Friedman, a Nevada state prisoner, appeals pro se from the district court’s order denying his motion for reconsideration of the denial of his motion for partial summary judgment. We dismiss.
We lack jurisdiction over this appeal because the district court’s order “[did] not dispose of all claims and [did] not end the litigation on the merits,” and is thus not a final, appealable order. Williamson v. UNUM Life Ins. Co. of Am., 160 F.3d 1247, 1250 (9th Cir.1998); see also 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (appellate jurisdiction over “final decisions”).
DISMISSED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
465 F. App'x 600, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/friedman-v-las-vegas-metropolitan-police-department-ca9-2012.