Friedman v. Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department

Ninth Circuit

Friedman v. Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department

465 F. App'x 600

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided January 4, 2012·No. 10-17812·Unpublished

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Kenneth A. Friedman, a Nevada state prisoner, appeals pro se from the district court’s order denying his motion for reconsideration of the denial of his motion for partial summary judgment. We dismiss.

We lack jurisdiction over this appeal because the district court’s order “[did] not dispose of all claims and [did] not end the litigation on the merits,” and is thus not a final, appealable order. Williamson v. UNUM Life Ins. Co. of Am., 160 F.3d 1247, 1250 (9th Cir.1998); see also 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (appellate jurisdiction over “final decisions”).

DISMISSED.

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MEMORANDUM **

Kenneth A. Friedman, a Nevada state prisoner, appeals pro se from the district court’s order denying his motion for reconsideration of the denial of his motion for partial summary judgment. We dismiss.

We lack jurisdiction over this appeal because the district court’s order “[did] not dispose of all claims and [did] not end the litigation on the merits,” and is thus not a final, appealable order. Williamson v. UNUM Life Ins. Co. of Am., 160 F.3d 1247, 1250 (9th Cir.1998); see also 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (appellate jurisdiction over “final decisions”).

DISMISSED.

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Friedman v. Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department, 465 F. App'x 600 (9th Cir. 2012).

Pincite

465 F. App'x 600 (Friedman v. Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related