Friedman v. Ladisky

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Friedman v. Ladisky

285 A.D. 878, 137 N.Y.S.2d 817, 1955 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5954

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 15, 1955

StatusPublished

This text of 285 A.D. 878 (Friedman v. Ladisky) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Friedman v. Ladisky, 285 A.D. 878, 137 N.Y.S.2d 817, 1955 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5954 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1955).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment in favor of plaintiff against the individual defendant unanimously affirmed, with costs to plaintiff-respondent; judgment in favor of plaintiff against unincorporated association unanimously reversed, the complaint dismissed and judgment is directed to be entered in favor of defendant association, with costs to the appellant association. The proof is legally insufficient to fix liability on the association or its several members (Martin v. Curran, 303 N. Y. 276). With respect to the verdict and judgment rendered in favor of plaintiff against the individual defendant, a cause of action was amply made out and while there were some errors in the admission of evidence, these were not of a substantial character sufficient to be prejudicial to the individual defendant or to constitute reversible error. Settle order. Present — Peek, P. J., Cohn, Breitel and Bastow, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment in favor of plaintiff against the individual defendant unanimously affirmed, with costs to plaintiff-respondent; judgment in favor of plaintiff against unincorporated association unanimously reversed, the complaint dismissed and judgment is directed to be entered in favor of defendant association, with costs to the appellant association. The proof is legally insufficient to fix liability on the association or its several members (Martin v. Curran, 303 N. Y. 276). With respect to the verdict and judgment rendered in favor of plaintiff against the individual defendant, a cause of action was amply made out and while there were some errors in the admission of evidence, these were not of a substantial character sufficient to be prejudicial to the individual defendant or to constitute reversible error. Settle order. Present — Peek, P. J., Cohn, Breitel and Bastow, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

285 A.D. 878, 137 N.Y.S.2d 817, 1955 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5954, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/friedman-v-ladisky-nyappdiv-1955.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack