Friedman v. James F. Scholes Co.
This text of 126 N.Y.S. 1129 (Friedman v. James F. Scholes Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment of the Municipal Court reversed, and new trial ordered, costs to abide the event, upon the ground that at the time of the injury to plaintiff Kroger must be deemed to be the servant of the American Sugar Refining Company, and hot of defendant. Baldwin v. Abraham, 57 App. Div. 67, 67 N. Y. Supp. 1079, affirmed 171 N. Y. 677, 64 N. E. 1118; Howard v. Ludwig, 57 App. Div. 94, 67 N. Y. Supp. 1095, affirmed 171 N. Y. 507, 64 N. E. 172; Kellogg v. Church Charity Foundation, 128 App. Div. 214, 112 N. Y. Supp. 566; McCarthy, v. McCabe, 131 App. Div. 396, 115 N. Y. Supp. 829; Muldoon v. City Fireproofing Co., 134 App. Div. 453, 456, 119 N. Y. Supp. 320; Kellogg v. Church Charity Foundation, 135 App. Div. 839, 120 N. Y. Supp. 406.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
126 N.Y.S. 1129, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/friedman-v-james-f-scholes-co-nyappdiv-1910.