Friedman v. James F. Scholes Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Friedman v. James F. Scholes Co.

142 A.D. 898

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 15, 1910·Published

Opinion

Judgment of the Municipal Court reversed and new trial ordered, costs to abide the event, upon-the ground that at .the time of the injury to plaintiff Kroger must be deemed to be the servant of the American Sugar Refining Company, and not of defendant. (Baldwin v. Abraham, 57 App. Div. 67; affd., 171 N. Y. 677; Howard v. Ludwig, 57 App. Div. 94; affd., 171 N. Y. 507; Kellogg v. Church Charity Foundation, 128 App. Div. 214, 135 id. 839; McCarthy v. McCabe, 131 id. 396; Muldoon v. City Fireproofing Co., 134 id. 453, 456.) Hirschberg, P. J., Woodward, Burr, Rich and Carr, JJ., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment of the Municipal Court reversed and new trial ordered, costs to abide the event, upon-the ground that at .the time of the injury to plaintiff Kroger must be deemed to be the servant of the American Sugar Refining Company, and not of defendant. (Baldwin v. Abraham, 57 App. Div. 67; affd., 171 N. Y. 677; Howard v. Ludwig, 57 App. Div. 94; affd., 171 N. Y. 507; Kellogg v. Church Charity Foundation, 128 App. Div. 214, 135 id. 839; McCarthy v. McCabe, 131 id. 396; Muldoon v. City Fireproofing Co., 134 id. 453, 456.) Hirschberg, P. J., Woodward, Burr, Rich and Carr, JJ., concurred.

Friedman v. James F. Scholes Co., 142 A.D. 898 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1910).

Pincite

142 A.D. 898 (Friedman v. James F. Scholes Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related