Friedman v. Inecto, Inc.
247 A.D. 878
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedApril 15, 1936
StatusPublished
This text of 247 A.D. 878 (Friedman v. Inecto, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Friedman v. Inecto, Inc., 247 A.D. 878 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).
Opinion
Action for 'personal injuries ¡resulting from use of a hair dye manufactured by defendant. Judgment dismissing the complaint at the close of plaintiff’s ease affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present—■ Martin, P. J., McAvoy, O’Malley, Townley and Glennon, JJ; O’Malley,. J., dissents and votes to reverse and grant a new trial.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
247 A.D. 878, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/friedman-v-inecto-inc-nyappdiv-1936.