Friedman v. Hirsch

18 N.Y.S. 87, 44 N.Y. St. Rep. 201

Opinion

Van Brunt, P. J.

This action is similar to that of Jacob Friedman v. Hirsch, 18 N. Y. Supp. 85, (decided herewith.) The evidence is substantially the same, with the-exception that it is not claimed that the plaintiff in this action was in a condition of imtoxication. The reasons which impelled the court to the conclusion arrived at in the case of the brother are certainly just as strong in the case at bar; otherwise the court would be seeming to give a premium on dissolute habits, and the same relief will be? granted. Ordered accordingly.