Friedman v. Herter

City of New York Municipal Court

Friedman v. Herter

35 Misc. 846, 72 N.Y.S. 1103

DecidedJune 15, 1901

StatusPublished

This text of 35 Misc. 846 (Friedman v. Herter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering City of New York Municipal Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Friedman v. Herter, 35 Misc. 846, 72 N.Y.S. 1103 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1901).

Pincite

Opinions

Conlan, J.

This action was brought to foreclose a mechanic’s lien upon certain premises on West Fifty-second street, in the city of Eew York. After issue joined, the case was referred to a referee to hear and determine. The complaint demands $400 as a balance due under the contract between the parties, and $530 for extra work. The judgment is for the $400, interest and costs, the charge for the extra work not having been found in the plaintiff’s favor.

We have examined the whole case, and think there was ample evidence to sustain the findings and conclusions reached by the learned referee, and do not find any reason for disturbing the conclusions reached by him, and the judgment appealed from must, therefore, be affirmed.

O’Dwyer, J., concurs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Conlan, J.

This action was brought to foreclose a mechanic’s lien upon certain premises on West Fifty-second street, in the city of Eew York. After issue joined, the case was referred to a referee to hear and determine. The complaint demands $400 as a balance due under the contract between the parties, and $530 for extra work. The judgment is for the $400, interest and costs, the charge for the extra work not having been found in the plaintiff’s favor.

We have examined the whole case, and think there was ample evidence to sustain the findings and conclusions reached by the learned referee, and do not find any reason for disturbing the conclusions reached by him, and the judgment appealed from must, therefore, be affirmed.

O’Dwyer, J., concurs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

35 Misc. 846, 72 N.Y.S. 1103, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/friedman-v-herter-nynyccityct-1901.