Friedman v. Friedman
This text of 285 A.D. 938 (Friedman v. Friedman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order granting temporary alimony and counsel fee unanimously reversed, and the motion denied on the ground that when the action was commenced the parties were still living together (Berman v. Berman, 277 App. Div. 560; Sommer v. Sommer, 285 App. Div. 809). No showing is made as to the necessity for plaintiff remaining at the matrimonial domicile while suing for a separation. It is immaterial that since the commencement of the action the wife has removed herself from the marital residence. It is noted further that, on this record, plaintiff wife has failed to make out a proper ease for temporary alimony and counsel fee, apart from the status of the parties at the time the action was commenced. Present — Peck, P. J., Breitel, Bastow, Botein and Rabin, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
285 A.D. 938, 138 N.Y.S.2d 838, 1955 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6186, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/friedman-v-friedman-nyappdiv-1955.