Friedman v. Friedman

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Friedman v. Friedman

63 So. 3d 127, 2011 La. LEXIS 1687, 2011 WL 2280871

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedJune 10, 2011

Docket2011-OC-1192

StatusPublished

This text of 63 So. 3d 127 (Friedman v. Friedman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Friedman v. Friedman, 63 So. 3d 127, 2011 La. LEXIS 1687, 2011 WL 2280871 (La. 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

Granted. The December 14, 2010, transcript clearly reveals that the trial court ordered the parties to prepare a written judgment. Therefore, the March 29, 2011, written judgment is the “ruling” at issue for purposes of Rule 4-3. See Kosmitis v. Bailey, 96-1573 (La.10/4/96), 680 So.2d 1167. Accordingly, the ruling of the court of appeal is set aside, and the case is remanded to the court of appeal to rule on the merits of the application.

JOHNSON, J., would stay the hearing and obtain an opposition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

Granted. The December 14, 2010, transcript clearly reveals that the trial court ordered the parties to prepare a written judgment. Therefore, the March 29, 2011, written judgment is the “ruling” at issue for purposes of Rule 4-3. See Kosmitis v. Bailey, 96-1573 (La.10/4/96), 680 So.2d 1167. Accordingly, the ruling of the court of appeal is set aside, and the case is remanded to the court of appeal to rule on the merits of the application.

JOHNSON, J., would stay the hearing and obtain an opposition.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

63 So. 3d 127, 2011 La. LEXIS 1687, 2011 WL 2280871, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/friedman-v-friedman-la-2011.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack