Friedman v. Friedman

144 So. 2d 866
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 25, 1962·No. No. 62-428·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant seeks review of a post decretal order in a divorce action directing the payment of attorney’s fees. The record discloses that the appellant wife moved the chancellor to transfer the question of child custody and support to the Juvenile and Domestic Relations Court of Dade County. This motion was denied, and subsequent thereto, the appellee petitioned for attorney’s fees, based on the contention that the appellant’s motion to transfer was frivolous. The petition was granted and the order appealed was entered.

Attorney’s fees as such are granted only when permitted by statute or contract. Neither existed in this instance. The specific question raised here was answered adverse to the appellee by this court in Davies v. Davies, Fla.App.1959, 113 So.2d 250.

Accordingly, the order appealed is reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Friedman v. Friedman, 144 So. 2d 866 (Fla. Ct. App. 1962).

144 So. 2d 866 (Friedman v. Friedman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Davies v. Davies
113 So. 2d 250 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1959)