Friedman v. Friedman

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Friedman v. Friedman

147 A. 907, 110 Conn. 696, 1929 Conn. LEXIS 48

DecidedNovember 25, 1929

StatusPublished

This text of 147 A. 907 (Friedman v. Friedman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Friedman v. Friedman, 147 A. 907, 110 Conn. 696, 1929 Conn. LEXIS 48 (Colo. 1929).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This is an action brought by the plaintiff to compel the defendant, his wife, to account for certain sums of money and the proceeds of certain notes which he claims to have delivered to her for safekeeping. The finding disproves his claim that any of these sums or the notes were given to the defendant *697 under circumstances such that she is under a legal liability to account for them. He seeks many corrections in the finding, but none of the changes sought which would have a material bearing upon the question of the defendant’s liability can be granted.

There is no error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

This is an action brought by the plaintiff to compel the defendant, his wife, to account for certain sums of money and the proceeds of certain notes which he claims to have delivered to her for safekeeping. The finding disproves his claim that any of these sums or the notes were given to the defendant *697 under circumstances such that she is under a legal liability to account for them. He seeks many corrections in the finding, but none of the changes sought which would have a material bearing upon the question of the defendant’s liability can be granted.

There is no error.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

147 A. 907, 110 Conn. 696, 1929 Conn. LEXIS 48, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/friedman-v-friedman-conn-1929.