Friedman v. Foodarama Supermarkets, Inc.
360 N.E.2d 960, 40 N.Y.2d 1058, 392 N.Y.S.2d 283, 1976 N.Y. LEXIS 3238
Opinion
Order affirmed, with costs. Applying the Pennsylvania law, as we are required to do, we affirm on the Per Curiam opinion at the Appellate Division (50 AD2d 246).
Concur: Chief Judge Breitel and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Cooke.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Friedman v. Foodarama Supermarkets, Inc., 360 N.E.2d 960, 40 N.Y.2d 1058, 392 N.Y.S.2d 283, 1976 N.Y. LEXIS 3238 (N.Y. 1976).
360 N.E.2d 960 (Friedman v. Foodarama Supermarkets, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Friedman v. Foodarama Supermarkets, Inc.
50 A.D.2d 246 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1975)