Friedman v. Foodarama Supermarkets, Inc.
360 N.E.2d 960, 40 N.Y.2d 1058, 392 N.Y.S.2d 283, 1976 N.Y. LEXIS 3238
This text of 360 N.E.2d 960 (Friedman v. Foodarama Supermarkets, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Friedman v. Foodarama Supermarkets, Inc., 360 N.E.2d 960, 40 N.Y.2d 1058, 392 N.Y.S.2d 283, 1976 N.Y. LEXIS 3238 (N.Y. 1976).
Opinion
Order affirmed, with costs. Applying the Pennsylvania law, as we are required to do, we affirm on the Per Curiam opinion at the Appellate Division (50 AD2d 246).
Concur: Chief Judge Breitel and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Cooke.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Friedman v. Foodarama Supermarkets, Inc.
50 A.D.2d 246 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1975)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
360 N.E.2d 960, 40 N.Y.2d 1058, 392 N.Y.S.2d 283, 1976 N.Y. LEXIS 3238, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/friedman-v-foodarama-supermarkets-inc-ny-1976.