Friedman v. Fleischman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Friedman v. Fleischman

40 A.D.2d 1001, 338 N.Y.S.2d 606, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3060

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 18, 1972

StatusPublished

This text of 40 A.D.2d 1001 (Friedman v. Fleischman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Friedman v. Fleischman, 40 A.D.2d 1001, 338 N.Y.S.2d 606, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3060 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1972).

Pincite

Opinion

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, defendant Mark Fleisehman appeals (1) from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated April 21, 1972, which denied his motion to dismiss the complaint as to him, as abandoned (CPLR 3215, subd. [c]), and (2) from so much of a further order of the same court, dated July 18,1972, as, on reargument, adhered to the original decision. Order dated July 18, 1972 affirmed insofar as appealed from. No opinion. Appeal from order dated April 21, 1972 dismissed. That order was superseded by the order dated July 18, 1972. Respondent Joe Jack Friedman is awarded one bill of $10 costs and disbursements to cover both appeals. Hopkins, Acting P. J., Gulotta, Christ, Brennan and Benjamin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, defendant Mark Fleisehman appeals (1) from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated April 21, 1972, which denied his motion to dismiss the complaint as to him, as abandoned (CPLR 3215, subd. [c]), and (2) from so much of a further order of the same court, dated July 18,1972, as, on reargument, adhered to the original decision. Order dated July 18, 1972 affirmed insofar as appealed from. No opinion. Appeal from order dated April 21, 1972 dismissed. That order was superseded by the order dated July 18, 1972. Respondent Joe Jack Friedman is awarded one bill of $10 costs and disbursements to cover both appeals. Hopkins, Acting P. J., Gulotta, Christ, Brennan and Benjamin, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

40 A.D.2d 1001, 338 N.Y.S.2d 606, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3060, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/friedman-v-fleischman-nyappdiv-1972.