Friedman v. Edward U. Kahn, Inc.

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Friedman v. Edward U. Kahn, Inc.

129 N.Y.S. 29

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedMay 4, 1911

StatusPublished

This text of 129 N.Y.S. 29 (Friedman v. Edward U. Kahn, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Friedman v. Edward U. Kahn, Inc., 129 N.Y.S. 29 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1911).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The court below having rendered judgment for the plaintiff, all disputed questions of fact must be deemed to have been determined in his favor, and should not be disturbed by this court, unless such determination is so against the weight of evidence as to indicate prejudice, misapprehension, or passion, which does not appear in this case. We are unable to discover, however, from a careful examination of the evidence, that the plaintiff showed himself entitled to more than $153.

Judgment modified, by reducing the amount to $153 and appropriate costs in the court below, and, as modified, affirmed, with $15 costs to the appellant to be applied upon the judgment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The court below having rendered judgment for the plaintiff, all disputed questions of fact must be deemed to have been determined in his favor, and should not be disturbed by this court, unless such determination is so against the weight of evidence as to indicate prejudice, misapprehension, or passion, which does not appear in this case. We are unable to discover, however, from a careful examination of the evidence, that the plaintiff showed himself entitled to more than $153.

Judgment modified, by reducing the amount to $153 and appropriate costs in the court below, and, as modified, affirmed, with $15 costs to the appellant to be applied upon the judgment.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

129 N.Y.S. 29, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/friedman-v-edward-u-kahn-inc-nyappterm-1911.