Friedman v. Donenfeld
889 A.2d 817, 276 Conn. 930
This text of 889 A.2d 817 (Friedman v. Donenfeld) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Friedman v. Donenfeld, 889 A.2d 817, 276 Conn. 930 (Colo. 2005).
Opinion
Drew FRIEDMAN et al.
v.
Irwin DONENFELD.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Hale C. Sargent, Westport, in support of the petition.
John B. Farley, Hartford, Lawrence P. Weisman, Westport and Ralph S. Loew, Stratford, in opposition.
The plaintiffs' petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 92 Conn.App. 33, 882 A.2d 1286 (2005), is denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Friedman v. Donenfeld
882 A.2d 1286 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2005)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
889 A.2d 817, 276 Conn. 930, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/friedman-v-donenfeld-conn-2005.