Friedman v. D'Amico

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Friedman v. D'Amico

123 N.Y.S. 953

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedJune 24, 1910

StatusPublished

This text of 123 N.Y.S. 953 (Friedman v. D'Amico) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Friedman v. D'Amico, 123 N.Y.S. 953 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1910).

Pincite

Opinion

BIJUR, J.

This action was brought for painting and paper hanging on premises the property of the defendant. Defendant claims that she never ordered the work done. She showed that she had a real estate agent, who always attended to this business for her. Plaintiffs admit that the husband gave the order, that they thought that he was the owner, and that they sent him the bill.

Upon this testimony, the judgment is,reversed, with costs, and the complaint dismissed. All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BIJUR, J.

This action was brought for painting and paper hanging on premises the property of the defendant. Defendant claims that she never ordered the work done. She showed that she had a real estate agent, who always attended to this business for her. Plaintiffs admit that the husband gave the order, that they thought that he was the owner, and that they sent him the bill.

Upon this testimony, the judgment is,reversed, with costs, and the complaint dismissed. All concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

123 N.Y.S. 953, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/friedman-v-damico-nyappterm-1910.