Friedman v. Connecticut Bar Examining Committee

853 A.2d 496, 270 Conn. 457, 2004 Conn. LEXIS 306
Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided August 3, 2004·No. SC 17049·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Opinion

PER CURIAM

The petitioner, David A. Friedman, appeals, following our grant of certification, from the judgment of the Appellate Court affirming the judgment of the trial court denying his petition for admission to the Connecticut bar. Friedman v. Connecticut Bar Examining Committee, 77 Conn. App. 526, 824 A.2d 866 (2003). We granted the petition for certification to appeal limited to the following issue: “Whether the actions of the Connecticut bar examining committee denied the petitioner due process?” Friedman v. Connecticut Bar Examining Committee, 265 Conn. 909, 910, 831 A.2d 249 (2003).

After examining the entire record on appeal and considering the briefs and oral arguments of the parties, we have determined that the appeal in this case should be dismissed on the ground that certification was improvidently granted.

The appeal is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Friedman v. Connecticut Bar Examining Committee, 853 A.2d 496, 270 Conn. 457, 2004 Conn. LEXIS 306 (Colo. 2004).

853 A.2d 496 (Friedman v. Connecticut Bar Examining Committee) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Disciplinary Counsel v. Spadoni
215 Conn. App. 249 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2022)
McLoughlin v. Planning & Zoning Commission
342 Conn. 737 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2022)
McLoughlin v. Planning & Zoning Commission
200 Conn. App. 307 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2020)
Statewide Grievance Committee v. Rapoport
987 A.2d 1075 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2010)