Friedman v. Connecticut Bar Examining Committee
This text of 853 A.2d 496 (Friedman v. Connecticut Bar Examining Committee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion
The petitioner, David A. Friedman, appeals, following our grant of certification, from the judgment of the Appellate Court affirming the judgment of the trial court denying his petition for admission to the Connecticut bar. Friedman v. Connecticut Bar Examining Committee, 77 Conn. App. 526, 824 A.2d 866 (2003). We granted the petition for certification to appeal limited to the following issue: “Whether the actions of the Connecticut bar examining committee denied the petitioner due process?” Friedman v. Connecticut Bar Examining Committee, 265 Conn. 909, 910, 831 A.2d 249 (2003).
After examining the entire record on appeal and considering the briefs and oral arguments of the parties, we have determined that the appeal in this case should be dismissed on the ground that certification was improvidently granted.
The appeal is dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
853 A.2d 496, 270 Conn. 457, 2004 Conn. LEXIS 306, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/friedman-v-connecticut-bar-examining-committee-conn-2004.