Friedman v. Cicoria

54 A.2d 922, 140 N.J. Eq. 404, 1947 N.J. LEXIS 502
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided September 12, 1947·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from is affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion of Vice-Chancellor Fielder, filed in the Court of Chancery.

For affirmance — The Ci-iiee-Justice, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Colie, Wacheneeld, Eastwood, Burling, Wells, Dill, McGeehan, 'McLean, Schettino, JJ. 13. For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Friedman v. Cicoria, 54 A.2d 922, 140 N.J. Eq. 404, 1947 N.J. LEXIS 502 (N.J. 1947).

54 A.2d 922 (Friedman v. Cicoria) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Olson v. Jantausch
130 A.2d 650 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1957)
Weinstein v. Swartz
68 A.2d 865 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1949)
Jackson v. Lane
59 A.2d 662 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1948)