Friedman v. Chevra Chasidim Sedigir Tferes Israel Merizin
253 A.D. 730, 1 N.Y.S.2d 508, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5358
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 10, 1937·Published
Opinion
Order denying the defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint pursuant to subdivision 8 of rule 107 of the Rules of Civil Practice, affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, with leave to defendant to serve an answer within ten days from the entry of the order hereon. No opinion. Hagarty, Davis, Adel, Taylor and Close, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Friedman v. Chevra Chasidim Sedigir Tferes Israel Merizin, 253 A.D. 730, 1 N.Y.S.2d 508, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5358 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1937).
253 A.D. 730 (Friedman v. Chevra Chasidim Sedigir Tferes Israel Merizin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.