Friedman v. Chevra Chasidim Sedigir Tferes Israel Merizin
This text of 253 A.D. 730 (Friedman v. Chevra Chasidim Sedigir Tferes Israel Merizin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order denying the defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint pursuant to subdivision 8 of rule 107 of the Rules of Civil Practice, affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, with leave to defendant to serve an answer within ten days from the entry of the order hereon. No opinion. Hagarty, Davis, Adel, Taylor and Close, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
253 A.D. 730, 1 N.Y.S.2d 508, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5358, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/friedman-v-chevra-chasidim-sedigir-tferes-israel-merizin-nyappdiv-1937.