Friedman Mirror & Glass Co. v. United States
39 Cust. Ct. 388
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Friedman Mirror & Glass Co. v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 34 Cust. Ct. 236 →
United States Customs Court·Decided July 31, 1957·No. No. 61101; protests 266393-K, etc. (New York)·Published
Opinion
Opinion by
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of glass strips specially designed and manufactured for use as a frame around mirrors the same as those the subject of Friedman Mirror & Glass Co., Inc. v. United States (34 Cust. Ct. 236, C. D. 1710), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Friedman Mirror & Glass Co. v. United States, 39 Cust. Ct. 388 (cusc 1957).
39 Cust. Ct. 388 (Friedman Mirror & Glass Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Friedman Mirror & Glass Co. v. United States
34 Cust. Ct. 236 (U.S. Customs Court, 1955)