Friedlander v. Lehman
This text of 101 N.Y.S. 252 (Friedlander v. Lehman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Evidence that plaintiff paid out money for defendant, and between certain dates rendered services to defendant, which' plaintiff considers worth a certain sum of money, does not warrant a conclusion that defendant is under any liability. No request or-reasonable occasion for paying the money or rendering the service-being shown, no liability to the plaintiff exists. The affidavit upon-which the warrant was issued shows no facts from which it can be in- • ferred that any money is due plaintiff, no request or reasonable occasion to lay out the money or render the service specified being shown..
The judgment will be reversed, and a new trial ordered, with costL to appellant to abide the event.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
101 N.Y.S. 252, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/friedlander-v-lehman-nyappterm-1906.