Friedlander v. Fuld & Hatch Knitting Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Friedlander v. Fuld & Hatch Knitting Co.

113 S.E. 100, 28 Ga. App. 743, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 819

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedJuly 11, 1922

Docket13568

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 113 S.E. 100 (Friedlander v. Fuld & Hatch Knitting Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Friedlander v. Fuld & Hatch Knitting Co., 113 S.E. 100, 28 Ga. App. 743, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 819 (Ga. Ct. App. 1922).

Pincite

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

1. Under the pleadings and the agreed statement of facts, the judgment of the court, sitting by consent without the intervention of a jury, in favor of the plaintiff was authorized, and the overruling of the defendant’s motion for a new trial was not error.

2. It not appearing that the writ of error in this case was prosecuted for the purpose of delay only, the request of defendant in error for the award of damages is denied.

Judgment affirmed.

Lulce and Bloodworth, JJ,, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI