Friedland v. Friedland
202 A.D. 789
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 15, 1922
StatusPublished
This text of 202 A.D. 789 (Friedland v. Friedland) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Friedland v. Friedland, 202 A.D. 789 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1922).
Opinion
Order affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Present — Clarke, P. J., Laughlin, Dowling, Smith and Greenbaum, JJ.; Laughlin, J., dissenting on the authority of Watkins v. Watkins (197 App. Div. 489), and voting for decree of annulment.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Watkins v. Watkins
197 A.D. 489 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1921)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
202 A.D. 789, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/friedland-v-friedland-nyappdiv-1922.