Friedland v. 601 West 149th Street, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Friedland v. 601 West 149th Street, Inc.

11 A.D.2d 921, 205 N.Y.S.2d 960, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8362

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 13, 1960

StatusPublished

This text of 11 A.D.2d 921 (Friedland v. 601 West 149th Street, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Friedland v. 601 West 149th Street, Inc., 11 A.D.2d 921, 205 N.Y.S.2d 960, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8362 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1960).

Pincite

Opinion

Order dated July 6, 1960 denying, in part, a motion to examine defendants before trial and limiting the examination, unanimously modified, in the exercise of discretion, to the extent of granting the motion additionally as to items 4, 12 and 13, and otherwise affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to appellant. Under the circumstances, Special Term properly restricted the examination to items relating to the claims of plaintiff in his individual capacity. However, it appears that items 4, 12 and 13 do relate to the individual causes of action and should not have been eliminated. Settle order on notice fixing dates for examination to proceed. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Rabin, Valente and McNally, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order dated July 6, 1960 denying, in part, a motion to examine defendants before trial and limiting the examination, unanimously modified, in the exercise of discretion, to the extent of granting the motion additionally as to items 4, 12 and 13, and otherwise affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to appellant. Under the circumstances, Special Term properly restricted the examination to items relating to the claims of plaintiff in his individual capacity. However, it appears that items 4, 12 and 13 do relate to the individual causes of action and should not have been eliminated. Settle order on notice fixing dates for examination to proceed. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Rabin, Valente and McNally, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

11 A.D.2d 921, 205 N.Y.S.2d 960, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8362, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/friedland-v-601-west-149th-street-inc-nyappdiv-1960.