Friedland Associates v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Friedland Associates v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.

65 A.D.2d 807, 410 N.Y.S.2d 1018, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13689

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 27, 1978

StatusPublished

This text of 65 A.D.2d 807 (Friedland Associates v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Friedland Associates v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co., 65 A.D.2d 807, 410 N.Y.S.2d 1018, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13689 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1978).

Pincite

Opinion

—In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of an agency agreement, defendants appeal (1) as limited by their notice of appeal and brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Rockland County, entered October 31, 1977, as refused to strike plaintiffs Interrogatories Nos. 6 and 11, and (2) from a further order of the same court, entered January 26, 1978, which denied their motion for leave to reargue. Appeal from order entered January 26, 1978 dismissed, without costs or disbursements. No appeal lies from an order denying leave to reargue. Order entered October 31, 1977 modified by adding thereto a provision that Interrogatories Nos. 6 and 11 need only be answered as they pertain to the period January 1, 1975 through December 31, 1976, and that Interrogatory No. 6 is limited to New York State policyholders. As so modified, order affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements. Interrogatories Nos. 6 and 11 are overly broad in scope, and burdensome, to the extent indicated. Hopkins, J. P., Damiani, Rabin and Margett, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of an agency agreement, defendants appeal (1) as limited by their notice of appeal and brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Rockland County, entered October 31, 1977, as refused to strike plaintiffs Interrogatories Nos. 6 and 11, and (2) from a further order of the same court, entered January 26, 1978, which denied their motion for leave to reargue. Appeal from order entered January 26, 1978 dismissed, without costs or disbursements. No appeal lies from an order denying leave to reargue. Order entered October 31, 1977 modified by adding thereto a provision that Interrogatories Nos. 6 and 11 need only be answered as they pertain to the period January 1, 1975 through December 31, 1976, and that Interrogatory No. 6 is limited to New York State policyholders. As so modified, order affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements. Interrogatories Nos. 6 and 11 are overly broad in scope, and burdensome, to the extent indicated. Hopkins, J. P., Damiani, Rabin and Margett, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

65 A.D.2d 807, 410 N.Y.S.2d 1018, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13689, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/friedland-associates-v-lumbermens-mutual-casualty-co-nyappdiv-1978.