Friedin v. Fields
76 S.E. 167, 11 Ga. App. 790, 1912 Ga. App. LEXIS 183
Opinion
The evidence was conflicting and fully authorized the verdict in the plaintiff’s favor. . The charge contained some inaccuracies, but, as a whole, fairly stated the issues made by the pleadings and the evidence. Failure to give the correct rule for measuring the defendant’s damage under his plea of recoupment is not cause for a new trial, since the jury found wholly against the plea. Hill v. Harris, 11 Ga. App. 358 (75 S. E. 518). There was no error requiring a new trial.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Friedin v. Fields, 76 S.E. 167, 11 Ga. App. 790, 1912 Ga. App. LEXIS 183 (Ga. Ct. App. 1912).
76 S.E. 167 (Friedin v. Fields) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Shaheen v. Kiker
125 S.E.2d 541 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1962)