Friedin v. Fields

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Friedin v. Fields

76 S.E. 167, 11 Ga. App. 790, 1912 Ga. App. LEXIS 183

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedNovember 12, 1912

Docket4325

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 76 S.E. 167 (Friedin v. Fields) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Friedin v. Fields, 76 S.E. 167, 11 Ga. App. 790, 1912 Ga. App. LEXIS 183 (Ga. Ct. App. 1912).

Pincite

Opinion

Pottle, J.

The evidence was conflicting and fully authorized the verdict in the plaintiff’s favor. . The charge contained some inaccuracies, but, as a whole, fairly stated the issues made by the pleadings and the evidence. Failure to give the correct rule for measuring the defendant’s damage under his plea of recoupment is not cause for a new trial, since the jury found wholly against the plea. Hill v. Harris, 11 Ga. App. 358 (75 S. E. 518). There was no error requiring a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pottle, J.

The evidence was conflicting and fully authorized the verdict in the plaintiff’s favor. . The charge contained some inaccuracies, but, as a whole, fairly stated the issues made by the pleadings and the evidence. Failure to give the correct rule for measuring the defendant’s damage under his plea of recoupment is not cause for a new trial, since the jury found wholly against the plea. Hill v. Harris, 11 Ga. App. 358 (75 S. E. 518). There was no error requiring a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

76 S.E. 167, 11 Ga. App. 790, 1912 Ga. App. LEXIS 183, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/friedin-v-fields-gactapp-1912.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack