Friedfeld v. Chemical Corn Exchange Bank

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Friedfeld v. Chemical Corn Exchange Bank

22 A.D.2d 809, 254 N.Y.S.2d 636, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2794

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 16, 1964

StatusPublished

This text of 22 A.D.2d 809 (Friedfeld v. Chemical Corn Exchange Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Friedfeld v. Chemical Corn Exchange Bank, 22 A.D.2d 809, 254 N.Y.S.2d 636, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2794 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1964).

Pincite

Opinion

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injury, the defendant appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, entered February 25, 1964 after trial upon a jury’s verdict in favor of the plaintiff administrator. The plaintiff’s intestate died before the trial; and during trial, her husband’s cause of action for loss'of services was discontinued. Judgment reversed on the law and the facts, without costs, and complaint dismissed on the law, without costs. In our opinion, the plaintiff failed to establish that the defendant had not exercised reasonable care in the maintenance of the premises under the weather conditions prevailing at the time of the accident (cf. Spaulding v. Christakos, 269 App. Div. 909, affd. 295 N. Y. 973; Miller v. Gimbel Bros., 262 N. Y. 107; Antenen v. New York Tel. Co., 271 N. Y. 558; Boccaccino v. Our Lady of Pity Roman Catholic Church, 18 A D 2d 1055; Vaglio v. Our Lady of Mount Carmel R. C. Church, 22 A D 2d 815). Beldock, P. J., Kleinfeld, Christ, Hill and Rabin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injury, the defendant appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, entered February 25, 1964 after trial upon a jury’s verdict in favor of the plaintiff administrator. The plaintiff’s intestate died before the trial; and during trial, her husband’s cause of action for loss'of services was discontinued. Judgment reversed on the law and the facts, without costs, and complaint dismissed on the law, without costs. In our opinion, the plaintiff failed to establish that the defendant had not exercised reasonable care in the maintenance of the premises under the weather conditions prevailing at the time of the accident (cf. Spaulding v. Christakos, 269 App. Div. 909, affd. 295 N. Y. 973; Miller v. Gimbel Bros., 262 N. Y. 107; Antenen v. New York Tel. Co., 271 N. Y. 558; Boccaccino v. Our Lady of Pity Roman Catholic Church, 18 A D 2d 1055; Vaglio v. Our Lady of Mount Carmel R. C. Church, 22 A D 2d 815). Beldock, P. J., Kleinfeld, Christ, Hill and Rabin, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

22 A.D.2d 809, 254 N.Y.S.2d 636, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2794, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/friedfeld-v-chemical-corn-exchange-bank-nyappdiv-1964.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack