Frieder v. Mohawk Airlines, Inc.

48 Misc. 2d 169, 264 N.Y.S.2d 398, 1965 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1786
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedJune 12, 1965
StatusPublished

This text of 48 Misc. 2d 169 (Frieder v. Mohawk Airlines, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Frieder v. Mohawk Airlines, Inc., 48 Misc. 2d 169, 264 N.Y.S.2d 398, 1965 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1786 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1965).

Opinion

Harry E. Schirick, J.

Upon defendant’s motion a preclusion order will be granted unless a bill of particulars is served within 20 days.

Plaintiff has moved for disclosure of the airplane involved in the accident, and the maintenance records with respect thereto, [170]*170and to examine defendant’s employees concerning the same. Motion papers were mailed on December 17,1964. On December 29, 1964 the airplane was delivered by defendant to Ozark Airlines and all maintenance records were delivered therewith.

Ozark is willing to make snch plane and records available. The issue is who should bear the cost.

Since defendant acted with full knowledge of the materiality of the evidence and plaintiff’s application for discovery thereof, the expense incurred by its action should be borne by it.

The motion to examine defendant’s employees is granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
48 Misc. 2d 169, 264 N.Y.S.2d 398, 1965 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1786, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/frieder-v-mohawk-airlines-inc-nysupct-1965.