Friedenberg v. Evans

262 A.D. 1013, 30 N.Y.S.2d 558

This text of 262 A.D. 1013 (Friedenberg v. Evans) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Friedenberg v. Evans, 262 A.D. 1013, 30 N.Y.S.2d 558 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1941).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

It was decided on the motion for summary judgment in this case (258 App. Div. 715) and by the decision of the majority of this court, reversing a judgment entered on a verdict in favor of the plaintiff (259 App. Div. 605), that there were questions of fact to be tried. We find no such substantial difference in the case here presented as would justify a departure from the law of the case as established by these decisions.

The judgment should be reversed and a new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide the event.

Present —■ Martin, P. J., O’Malley, Townley, Glennon and Untermyer, JJ.

Judgment unanimously reversed and a new trial ordered, with costs to the appellant to abide the event.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Friedenberg v. Evans
259 A.D. 605 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1940)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
262 A.D. 1013, 30 N.Y.S.2d 558, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/friedenberg-v-evans-nyappdiv-1941.