Friedberg v. United States

23 Cust. Ct. 166, 1949 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 891
CourtUnited States Customs Court
DecidedSeptember 20, 1949
DocketNo. 53554; protests 971934-G, etc. (Los Angeles)
StatusPublished

This text of 23 Cust. Ct. 166 (Friedberg v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Friedberg v. United States, 23 Cust. Ct. 166, 1949 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 891 (cusc 1949).

Opinion

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.

Cole, J., dissented on jurisdictional grounds, citing Geo. S. Bush & Co., Inc., et al. v. United States (22 Cust. Ct. 158, C. D. 1175), Fuchs Shoe Corp. v. United States (id. 338, Abstract 53250), and W. R. Zanes & Co. v. United States (id. 339, Abstract 53251).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Geo. S. Bush & Co. v. United States
22 Cust. Ct. 158 (U.S. Customs Court, 1949)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
23 Cust. Ct. 166, 1949 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 891, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/friedberg-v-united-states-cusc-1949.