Friedberg v. United States
23 Cust. Ct. 166, 1949 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 891
United States Customs Court·Decided September 20, 1949·No. No. 53554; protests 971934-G, etc. (Los Angeles)·Published
Opinion
Opinion by
Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
Cole, J., dissented on jurisdictional grounds, citing Geo. S. Bush & Co., Inc., et al. v. United States (22 Cust. Ct. 158, C. D. 1175), Fuchs Shoe Corp. v. United States (id. 338, Abstract 53250), and W. R. Zanes & Co. v. United States (id. 339, Abstract 53251).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Friedberg v. United States, 23 Cust. Ct. 166, 1949 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 891 (cusc 1949).
23 Cust. Ct. 166 (Friedberg v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Geo. S. Bush & Co. v. United States
22 Cust. Ct. 158 (U.S. Customs Court, 1949)