Home/Supreme Court of South Carolina/Friedberg v. Goudeau

Friedberg v. Goudeau

309 S.E.2d 578, 279 S.C. 561, 1983 S.C. App. LEXIS 77
CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina
DecidedDecember 5, 1983
Docket22013
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 309 S.E.2d 578 (Friedberg v. Goudeau) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Friedberg v. Goudeau, 309 S.E.2d 578, 279 S.C. 561, 1983 S.C. App. LEXIS 77 (S.C. 1983).

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The appellants brought this action for partition of a cotenancy in which they owned the surface rights and one-half of the mineral rights. The respondents owned the remaining half of the mineral rights. Respondents moved for summary j udgment, and summary j udgment was granted on the ground that appellants impliedly agreed not to seek, partition of the mineral rights.

The record does not reveal that this ground was properly before the trial court. We accordingly reverse the entry of summary judgment. We express no opinion regarding the merits of the partition action.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Grazia v. South Carolina State Plastering, LLC
703 S.E.2d 197 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 2010)
City of North Myrtle Beach v. Lewis-Davis
599 S.E.2d 462 (Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 2004)
Griffin v. Capital Cash
423 S.E.2d 143 (Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
309 S.E.2d 578, 279 S.C. 561, 1983 S.C. App. LEXIS 77, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/friedberg-v-goudeau-sc-1983.