Frieda Steinberg v. United States

Eighth Circuit

Frieda Steinberg v. United States

201 F.2d 371

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

DecidedDecember 31, 1952

Docket14687_1

StatusPublished

This text of 201 F.2d 371 (Frieda Steinberg v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Frieda Steinberg v. United States, 201 F.2d 371 (8th Cir. 1952).

Pincite

Opinion

201 F.2d 371

Frieda STEINBERG, Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES of America.

No. 14687.

United States Court of Appeals Eighth Circuit.

Dec. 31, 1952.

Maurice J. Gordon, St. Louis, Mo., for appellant.

Ed Dupree, Gen. Counsel, Office of Rent Stabilization, A. M. Edwards, Jr., Asst. Gen. Counsel, Orrice of Rent Stabilization, Nathan Siegel, Sol., Office of Rent Stabilization, and William A. Moran, Sp. Litigation Atty., Office of Rent Stabilization, Washington, D.C., for appellee

PER CURIAM.

Appeal from District Court dismissed for want of prosecution, etc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

201 F.2d 371

Frieda STEINBERG, Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES of America.

No. 14687.

United States Court of Appeals Eighth Circuit.

Dec. 31, 1952.

Maurice J. Gordon, St. Louis, Mo., for appellant.

Ed Dupree, Gen. Counsel, Office of Rent Stabilization, A. M. Edwards, Jr., Asst. Gen. Counsel, Orrice of Rent Stabilization, Nathan Siegel, Sol., Office of Rent Stabilization, and William A. Moran, Sp. Litigation Atty., Office of Rent Stabilization, Washington, D.C., for appellee

PER CURIAM.

Appeal from District Court dismissed for want of prosecution, etc.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

201 F.2d 371, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/frieda-steinberg-v-united-states-ca8-1952.