Fried v. Strausman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Fried v. Strausman

59 A.D.2d 923, 399 N.Y.S.2d 615, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14135

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 21, 1977

StatusPublished

This text of 59 A.D.2d 923 (Fried v. Strausman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Fried v. Strausman, 59 A.D.2d 923, 399 N.Y.S.2d 615, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14135 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1977).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action, inter alia, to enjoin defendants, owners of a proprietary nursing home, from preventing plaintiffs’ visits and rendering of medical services to their patients who are residents of the nursing home, plaintiffs appeal from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered May 23, 1977, as (1) dismissed their complaint following a nonjury trial and (2) awarded defendants costs and disbursements. Judgment affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs. The record amply supports the findings of the trial court in accordance with the legal standard for judicial review of such exclusion as delineated by the Court of Appeals in Fried v Straussman (41 NY2d 376). Gulotta, P. J., Hopkins, Latham and Cohalan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action, inter alia, to enjoin defendants, owners of a proprietary nursing home, from preventing plaintiffs’ visits and rendering of medical services to their patients who are residents of the nursing home, plaintiffs appeal from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered May 23, 1977, as (1) dismissed their complaint following a nonjury trial and (2) awarded defendants costs and disbursements. Judgment affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs. The record amply supports the findings of the trial court in accordance with the legal standard for judicial review of such exclusion as delineated by the Court of Appeals in Fried v Straussman (41 NY2d 376). Gulotta, P. J., Hopkins, Latham and Cohalan, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

59 A.D.2d 923, 399 N.Y.S.2d 615, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14135, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fried-v-strausman-nyappdiv-1977.