Fried v. Fried
230 A.D. 708
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 15, 1930·Published·Cited by 5 cases
Opinion
Order denying defendant’s motion to vacate notice of examination before trial reversed upon the law, without costs, amd motion granted, without costs, upon the authority of Safrin v. Safrin (205 App. Div. 628); Horsch v. Horsch (206 id. 710) and Hutaff v. Hutaff (208 id. 745). Linnekin v. Linnekin (96 Misc. 56) is contrary to the weight of authority and should not be followed. Lazansky, P. J., Rich, Young, Hagarty and Carswell, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Fried v. Fried, 230 A.D. 708 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1930).
230 A.D. 708 (Fried v. Fried) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Kirshner v. Kirshner
7 A.D.2d 202 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1959)
Jasne v. Jasne
10 Misc. 2d 59 (New York Supreme Court, 1952)
Augustin v. Augustin
277 A.D.2d 777 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1950)
Appelbaum v. Appelbaum
273 A.D. 966 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1948)
Malone v. Malone
231 A.D. 763 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1930)