Fried v. Feldman

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Fried v. Feldman

148 N.Y.S. 253

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedJune 18, 1914

StatusPublished

This text of 148 N.Y.S. 253 (Fried v. Feldman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Fried v. Feldman, 148 N.Y.S. 253 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1914).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff sued for broker’s commissions. At the close of plaintiff’s case, on motion of the defendant, the complaint was dismissed. Giving the testimony of the plaintiff and his witnesses the benefit of every legitimate inference that can be drawn therefrom, there was sufficient proof of the employment of the plaintiff by the defendant to purchase a house, and a promise on defendant’s part to pay for such services.

Judgment reversed, and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide the event.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff sued for broker’s commissions. At the close of plaintiff’s case, on motion of the defendant, the complaint was dismissed. Giving the testimony of the plaintiff and his witnesses the benefit of every legitimate inference that can be drawn therefrom, there was sufficient proof of the employment of the plaintiff by the defendant to purchase a house, and a promise on defendant’s part to pay for such services.

Judgment reversed, and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide the event.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

148 N.Y.S. 253, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fried-v-feldman-nyappterm-1914.