Fridley v. Bitley

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Fridley v. Bitley

1 Minn. 426

DecidedJanuary 15, 1857

StatusPublished

This text of 1 Minn. 426 (Fridley v. Bitley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Fridley v. Bitley, 1 Minn. 426 (Mich. 1857).

Pincite

Opinion

This was an action commenced by the Respondents, for the foreclosure of a Mortgage, executed by the Appellants. The Defendants answered setting up a defence to the action, to which answer the Plaintiff demurred. The District Court sustained the Demurrer, and judgment was entered for want of ;an answer.

The Defendant appealed from the Order sustaining the Demurrer.

The record in this cause is so imperfect, that no report can be prepared.

The judgment of the District Court was reversed, but no 'Opinion is on file.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

This was an action commenced by the Respondents, for the foreclosure of a Mortgage, executed by the Appellants. The Defendants answered setting up a defence to the action, to which answer the Plaintiff demurred. The District Court sustained the Demurrer, and judgment was entered for want of ;an answer.

The Defendant appealed from the Order sustaining the Demurrer.

The record in this cause is so imperfect, that no report can be prepared.

The judgment of the District Court was reversed, but no 'Opinion is on file.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 Minn. 426, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fridley-v-bitley-minn-1857.